AWS Cost  Optimization | DevOps Transformation

  • About Us
  • Services
    • AWS – Cloud – Optimization
    • AWS Well-Architected Framework
    • Cloud Migration Strategy
    • Cloud Native Developers
    • DevOps-Transformation
    • Digital Marketing
    • Disaster Recovery – Public Cloud
    • Managed Cloud Services
    • Web Application Firewall
    • Web Development
  • Industries
    • Automotive, Transportation, and Logistics
    • Consumer Goods
    • Education
    • Financial Services
    • Food & Beverages
    • Information Technology
    • Manufacturing
    • Media & Entertainment
    • Oil & Gas
  • Blogs
  • Contact
REQUEST A QUOTE

Difference Between Application Load Balancer and Network Load Balancer

Wednesday, 11 November 2020 / Published in AWS Architected Framework, AWS Cloud Optimization

Difference Between Application Load Balancer and Network Load Balancer

AWS Services Difference Between Application Load Balancer and Network Load Balancer

TL;DR:
ALB — Layer 7, Flexible
NLB — Layer 4, Static IPs
CLB — Avoid, legacy

Amazon Web Services or AWS is the latest as well as the most trending services that the majority of the companies in every business sector are adopting. Today in this blog we are going to discuss the difference between the application load balancer and the network load balancer.

It is that both application load balancer and network load balancer are designed from the ground for the modern paradigm of dynamic port configurations as commonly seen in containerized deployments. Moreover, the selection of or picking of which type of load balancer is right for the business will always depend on the specific need for the applications. This is all considered as to whether or not network traffic is HTTP, whether you need an end to end SSL/TLS encryption, and whether or not you want to host and path-based traffic routing.

If you are deploying Docker containers and using a load balancer to send network traffic to the EC2 Container Service provides tight integration with ALB and NLB so you can keep your load balancers in sync as you start, update, and stop containers across your fleet.

Network Load Balancer — This is the distribution of traffic based on network variables, such as IP address and destination ports. It is layer 4 (TCP) and below and is not designed to take into consideration anything at the application layer such as content type, cookie data, custom headers, user location, or the application behavior. It is context-less, caring only about the network-layer information contained within the packets it is directing this way and that.

This is a TCP Load Balancer only that does some NAT magic at the VPC level. It uses EIPs, so it has a static endpoint unlike ALB and CLBs (by default, contact support if this is a requirement for your CLB or ALB). Each Target can be on different ports.

Application Load Balancer — This is the distribution of requests based on multiple variables, from the network layer to the application layer. It is context-aware and can direct requests based on any single variable as easily as it can a combination of variables. Applications are load-balanced based on their peculiar behavior and not solely on server (operating system or virtualization layer) information.
This is a feature-filled L7 load balancer, HTTP, and HTTPS listeners only. Provides the ability to route HTTP and HTTPS traffic based upon rules, host-based, or path based. Like an NLB, each Target can be on different ports. Even supports HTTP/2. Configurable range of health check status codes (CLB only supports 200 OK for HTTP health checks).

The first difference is that the Application Load Balancer (as the name implies) works at the Application Layer (Layer 7 of the OSI model). The network load balancer works at layers 3 & 4 (network and transport layers). The network load balancer just forward requests whereas the application load balancer examines the contents of the HTTP request header to determine where to route the request. So, the application load balancer is performing content-based routing.

The other difference between the two is important because network load balancing cannot assure availability of the application. This is because it bases its decisions solely on network and TCP-layer variables and has no awareness of the application at all. Generally, a network load balancer will determine “availability” based on the ability of a server to respond to ICMP ping or to correctly complete the three-way TCP handshake. An application load balancer goes much deeper and is capable of determining availability based on not only a successful HTTP GET of a particular page but also the verification that the content is as was expected based on the input parameters.

This is also important to note when considering the deployment of multiple applications on the same host sharing IP addresses (virtual hosts in old school speak). A network load balancer will not differentiate between Application A and Application B when checking availability (indeed it cannot unless ports are different) but an application load balancer will differentiate between the two applications by examining the application-layer data available to it. This difference means that a network load balancer may end up sending requests to an application that has crashed or is offline, but an application load balancer will never make that same mistake.

Conclusion:
On reading this blog, we have clearly known the difference between the two services. We are available 24*7 to assist you in all the stages of the work. With the experience of years, we understand the need and requirements of the clients and based on that deliver the work as per their expectations.

What you can read next

Build Your Disaster Recovery Solution in the AWS Cloud Server
AWS Cost Optimization Services – Lets Conquer The Cloud Economies
Cost Optimization
7 Best Practices or Ways to Optimize AWS Cost Services

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search for posts

Loading

Recent Posts

  • What is Future of DevOps in 2022

    0 comments
  • DevOps tools and software :-Increase DevOps agility, shorten releases, improve reliability and stay ahead of the competition with DevOps tools

    0 comments
  • 4 Major Benefits of Using Kubernetes

    0 comments

Recent Comments

  • New York Consultants on Jenkins on Kubernetes Engine – Cloud Stack Group
  • Parbriz auto OPEL ASCONA C Hatchback J82 1981 on Strategies and Process of Migrating Applications to the Cloud
  • Geam Porsche Cayenne 9PA 2010 on Strategies and Process of Migrating Applications to the Cloud

Add Wings to the Modern Enterprise with the help of a Global Cloud Platform

The platform of Cloud Stack Group provides numerous options that are beneficial to the organisation. It is necessary that we follow all the process as we share the result that is scalable, accurate and convenient to use.

GET A QUOTE

Cloud Stack Group is the pioneered and well-established company that is working on the newest and the latest forms of AWS services. Being in a competitive market for more than 3+ years we have served with our services to more than 40 industries and 50+ fortune global companies

MENU

  • About Us
  • Services
  • Industries
  • Blogs
  • Contact

OUR BLOGS

VIEW ALL
  • What is Future of DevOps in 2022

  • DevOps tools and software :-Increase DevOps agility, shorten releases, improve reliability and stay ahead of the competition with DevOps tools

  • 4 Major Benefits of Using Kubernetes

COMPANY INFO

+91 9687177221

info@cloudstackgroup.com

WE'RE SOCIAL

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Loading

© 2019-2022 CLOUDSTACKGROUP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

A SADADIYA INDUSTRIES LLP COMPANY

TOP